All is right in the world.
So Susan Atkins finally dies, Roman Polanski is finally arrested for his rape of a 13 year old girl, and Eli Roth has been exposed for the creeper he is over at
ohnotheydidnt.
To make things even better, here's Sharon Tate:

![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-community.gif)
To make things even better, here's Sharon Tate:

no subject
And basically, it's like you're me. I mean, I found him ridiculous and had no real respect for him, but he was hot. So, you know, he'd come up on cliff/marry/shags sometimes and I'd be like "shag then cliff? :D? :D?" but basically now I am like >:( and just really pissed off that I EVEN STILL CARE ENOUGH TO GET ANGRY.
no subject
I FEEL THE EXACT SAME WAY. I think part of it is that I'm bothered that other women can't see what's wrong with him and the whole ONTD mess.
no subject
And yeah, see, I could see how Hostel could have played out differently, or been about what he seems to have wanted it to be about, but the movie he talks about having made and the movie he actually made are COMPLETELY DIFFERENT.
no subject
no subject
Also, yeah, Roth doesn't seem to realize when something is done. I know you don't like the Thanksgiving trailer, but I kind of thought it was good at what it was supposed to be -- which was basically just seeing how many times it could cross the line twice in four minutes, but whatever. But then he decided it needed to be made into a full-length movie. Which completely misses the point of the only thing that made the trailer successful, which was cramming all the over the top things in right together to shock you so much you became horrimused. As an actual movie, it wouldn't even be successful at that. (Although it does raise the question of if a filmmaker goes into a movie trying to make a bad movie and the movie is bad, was it successful?)
On the other hand, unlike above comments suggest, he's not actually involved in Hostel 3, afaik?
no subject
I didn't terribly mind the trailer for Thanksgiving, but that knife-in-the-vag got to me. However, he absolutely the feel of a nasty grindhouse film from 1981 down perfectly (even the voice-over was perfect) and I loved Michael Biehn in it. And you're right, it would not work as a full-length film. Initially, there would be the fun of spotting all of the trailer moments in the film, but what else is he going to cram in there? It's basically going to be Roth at play with his imagination and pretending he's Fulci or Carpenter or even Sam Peckinpah (who was about as stunted as Roth, but a very talented man, which can make his films even more infuriating). Though such an attitude could make Thanksgiving successful, as long he goes into the project with the purpose of having fun with it instead of making a purposefully awful film with grotesque imagery. There are more than enough wanna-be schlocky horror films that are failures because they specifically force themselves to be campy schlock, instead of letting it happen naturally. It especially ruins the appeal when the actors are knowingly in on the joke.
After some googling, it indeed appears that Roth has no involvement in Hostel 3 and it may in fact end up straight-to-DVD (which would be hilarious if it turned out to be the best of the Hostel films).
no subject
no subject
If your crush ever resurfaces, just remind yourself of FOURTH-WALL FREED CREATIVELY EMPOWERMENT.
no subject
no subject
I've never cared for Debra Winger, so it's good to know I'm not missing out on anything by continuing to not like her.
no subject
no subject